ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the efficiency and pharmacoeconomics of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCM) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).Methods:The data of 91 patients with newly treated MM who were hospitalized in the First Hospital of Jilin University and Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College from January 2015 to October 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the patient's wishes, a high-dose chemotherapy combined with subcutaneous injection of PEG-rhG-CSF or recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) was used for stem cell mobilization in 42 and 49 patients, respectively. The number of mononuclear cells (MNC) and CD34 + cells collected after mobilization, the maximum absolute neutrophil count (mANC), the cost of mobilization, and the engraftment time of white blood cells and platelets after transplantation were compared between the two groups. Results:The median number of MNC collected after mobilization in the PEG-rhG-CSF group and rhG-CSF group were 5.86×10 8/kg [(1.08-24.54)×10 8/kg] and 6.61×10 8/kg [(0.83-33.80)×10 8/kg], and the difference was not statistically significant ( U = 883.00, P = 0.245); while the median number of CD34 + cells collected after mobilization in the PEG-rhG-CSF group was higher than that in the rhG-CSF group [5.56×10 6/kg (0.94-19.90)×10 6/kg and 4.82×10 6/kg (1.12-14.61)×10 6/kg], and the difference was statistically significant ( U = 732.00, P = 0.038). The median number of mANC during mobilization in the PEG-rhG-CSF group was lower than that in the rhG-CSF group [20.50×10 9/L (7.26-61.30)×10 9/L and 32.08×10 9/L (6.92-69.99)×10 9/L], and the difference was statistically significant ( U = 490.00, P = 0.001). After autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), the time-to-recovery of white blood cell count (WBC) to 1.0×10 9/L in the PEG-rhG-CSF group was shorter than that in the rhG-CSF group [(11.59±1.98) d vs. (12.93±2.83) d], and the difference was statistically significant ( t = -2.395, P = 0.019), and the time-to-recovery of platelet count (Plt) to 20.0×10 9/L in the PEG-rhG-CSF group was also shorter than that in the rhG-CSF group [(12.86±2.62) d vs. (14.80±5.47) d], but the difference was not statistically significant ( t = -1.749, P = 0.085). The total mobilization cost of the PEG-rhG-CSF group was not statistically different from that of the rhG-CSF group [(21 405.47±7 365.98) yuan vs. (22 976.83±10 264.34) yuan, t = -0.721, P = 0.474]. Conclusions:PEG-rhG-CSF combined with high-dose chemotherapy is an effective option for PBSCM in MM patients, and its mobilization cost is equivalent to rhG-CSF. Therefore, PEG-rhG-CSF may be a better choice for PBSCM in MM patients.
ABSTRACT
Objectives@#To evaluate the clinical characteristics and prognosis of high risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCA) and various combinations of cytogenetic abnormality in patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) .@*Methods@#This retrospective study collected 182 NDMM patients in the First Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University between Nov. 2009 and May 2018. HRCA included 1q+, del (17p) , t (4;14) , and t (14;16) detected by FISH, and non-HRCA included del (13q) , t (11;14) detected by FISH. The clinical characteristics among three groups, including cases who carrying a single HRCA, 1 HRCA in combination with non-HRCA and cases carrying two or more HRCAs (double/triple-hit) were observed. Kaplan-Meier curve was used to analyze both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for the three groups.@*Results@#The survivals of patients with 1 HRCA in combination with non-HRCA were similar to those with two or more HRCAs (double/triple-hit) , the median PFS (mPFS) was 19.1 m vs 12.1 m (P=0.248) and median OS (mOS) was 29.6 m vs 29.3 m (P=0.774) . Furthermore, the prognosis of these two groups were both inferior to patients with a single HRCA, respectively. (mPFS: 32.2 m, P=0.040, P=0.001; mOS: 42.3 m, P=0.021, P=0.041) . Strikingly, both the mPFS and the mOS of patients with 1 HRCA in combination with non-HRCA (regardless of high risk or not) were significantly shorter than that of cases with a single HRCA (mPFS: 15.1 m vs 32.2 m, HR=2.126, 95%CI 1.176-3.843, P=0.005; mOS: 29.3 m vs 42.3 m, HR=1.442, 95%CI 0.705-2.950, P=0.011) .@*Conclusion@#It is of prognostic significance value for detecting double/triple-hit based on FISH cytogenetics in NDMM.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To evaluate the prognostic value of kinetic changes in minimal residual disease (MRD) status, as well as its relationship with risk stratification, therapeutic response and treatment in patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) .@*Methods@#A total of 135 patients with newly-diagnosed MM were screened, and 105 patients who achieved VGPR or more as the best responses were included into this study. The MRD status was determined by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) at multiple intervals after two cycles of treatment until clinical relapse, death, or last follow-up. The statistical methods included Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox regression, etc.@*Results@#①In all 135 patients, 57.8% (78/135) patients achieved MRD negativity (MRD-) after treatment. In 105 patients who achieved VGPR and thus included in this study, the MRD- rate was 72.4% (76/105) , with a median interval of 3 months from starting treatment to achievement of MRD- status. ②The 2-year PFS rate of patients with MRD- status was significantly higher than that of MRD+ status (62.2% vs 41.3%, P=0.001) , while MRD persistence (MRD+) was an independent factor for poor prognosis (multivariate analysis for PFS: P=0.044, HR=3.039, 95%CI 1.029-8.974) . ③Loss of MRD- status (i.e., MRD reappearance) showed inferior outcomes compared with MRD sustained negative ones, the PFS was 18 months versus not reach (P<0.001) and the OS was not reach for both (P=0.002) . ④The 2-year PFS and OS rates of patients with duration of MRD-status≥12 months were significantly higher than those of the control group (PFS: 77.7% vs 36.7%, P<0.001; OS: 96.4% vs 57.9%, P<0.001 respectively) . Duration of MRD- status was associated with a marked reduction in risk of relapse or death (univariate analysis for PFS: P<0.001, HR=0.865, 95%CI 0.815-0.918; for OS: P=0.001, HR=0.850, 95%CI 0.741-0.915 respectively) . ⑤Moreover, even in patients carrying high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (CA) or ineligible for ASCT, MRD negativity remained its prognostic value to predict PFS (high-risk CA medianPFS: not reach vs 19 months, P=0.006; ineligible for ASCT medianPFS: not reach vs 25 months, P=0.052 respectively) . ⑥Last, treatment with the bortezomib-based regimens contributed to prolonged MRD- duration (median MRD- duratio: 25 months vs 10 months, P=0.034) .@*Conclusion@#Our findings supported MRD+ status as an independent poor prognostic factor in MM patients, which implicated that duration of MRD- status also played a significant role in evaluation of prognosis, while loss of MRD-status might serve as an early biomarker for relapse. Therefore, monitoring of MRD kinetics might more precisely predict prognosis, as well as guide treatment decision, especially for when to start retreatment in relapsed patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To evaluate the prognostic significance of combining ISS-Ⅲ and high risk cytogenetic abnormalities [HRCAs, including 1q gain/amplification and del (17p) ] in patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) .@*Methods@#The clinical characteristics and relevant variables were retrospectively analyzed in a total of 270 NDMM patients diagnosed between November 2009 and May 2018. ISS-Ⅲ stage and HRCAs [detected by FISH, including 1q gain/amplification and del (17p) ] were defined as risk factors (hit) . Based to the number of hit per case, these patients were divided into four groups carrying 0 to 3 risk factors, respectively. Progress-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were then analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator.@*Results@#Patients who carried single hit (n=120, 44.4%) had shorter median PFS (23.0 vs 28.9 months; P>0.05) and OS (42.3 vs 53.7 months; P>0.05) than those with no risk factors (n=66, 24.4%) . Of note, the outcome of patients who had two or more risk factors (double/triple, n=84, 31.1%) was much worse than those with either no or one risk factor, indicated by significantly reduced median PFS (14.5 months; HR=1.584, 95%CI 1.082-2.319; P=0.003 for double/triple vs single hit) and OS (18.4 months, HR=2.299, 95%CI 1.485-3.560; P<0.001 for double/triple vs single hit) . Strikingly, patients who had three risk factor (triple hit, n=5, 1.9%) displayed the poorest survival with extraordinarily shorter PFS (0.9-15.1 months) and OS (0.9-18.9 months) compared to those carrying two risk factors (double hit) . Analogous results were obtained when different combinations of ISS stages and HRCAs were analyzed.@*Conclusion@#These results suggest a potential but rather important role of combining multiple (e.g. double or triple) adverse factors determined via the routine ISS staging and FISH detection of cytogenetic abnormalities in risk stratification and prognostic prediction, which might be helpful to identify high risk patients more precisely at diagnosis. It also raised a possibility that a small group of ISS-Ⅲ patients carrying both 1q gain/amplification and del (17p) might represent an "extremely-high risk" subset of MM.